Skip to main content

The Ísland.is App

Children's prosperity handbook - implementation of the law

In addition to this electronic version a PDF file in Icelandic is available.

    Model children's prosperity projects

    "Entrepreneurial municipalities" and children's prosperity

    The municipalities of Akranes, Akureyri, the Árborg region and Vestmannaeyjar took on the responsibility of becoming so-called "entrepreneurial municipalities" when implementing the law. By taking on this role, the municipalities got both space and opportunity to navigate challenges, and acquire information that other municipalities can learn from. The role also includes regular cooperation with the National Agency for Children and Families during the implementation period, which has created a basis for discussion about challenges and benefits, and has resulted in cooperation on the development and testing of support material.

    Here you can find information about projects that the these municipalities have worked on with positive results, so-called exemplary children's prosperity projects. Hopefully other municipalities and institutions can learn from their experience and use it in their own journeys towards prosperity for all children.

    Silja Rós Guðjónsdóttir, social worker supervisor and director of implementation of the children's prosperity law

    The municipality of Vestmannaeyjar is now in its third year of working according to the law on service integration for children's prosperity; requests for service integration from parents and children began in early 2022.

    Implementation

    Before the law was passed we were well prepared, as there was already effective cooperation between the welfare and school services. The family and education departments were merged into one department in 2006. Since then the cooperation has been solid and the communication channels short, but thanks to the service integration work the cooperation became even stronger and better.

    In the implementation process we started to map out the situation we had, i.e. what we were already doing, what resources and cooperation projects we had, and then if and how that would fit into the service integration work. We also evaluated what was needed in order to meet all the requirements. We started by inviting all service providers to a meeting where the law and the role of service providers were well presented, and we discussed various approaches and configurations for the work and cooperation. Presentations were also held for all service providers’ staff, as well as for elected representatives of the municipality. Next, decisions were made in cooperation with service providers’ managers on who would take on the role of contact persons and case managers. After that work began on preparing forms and procedures for both contacts and case managers.

    When all this was done, the service was advertised on all media in the municipality, and presented at parents' meetings in the schools. The interest was clear, because as soon as we opened an application system for service integration, we received numerous requests. At the end of 2022, the number of service integration cases had reached 105, out of just over 900 children who were then living in the municipality.

    This started off quickly and well for us, but we can feel today, in the program's third year, a certain balance has been reached on the requests. The number of requests for integration has slowed down, which we consider normal given how quickly they came in at the beginning, and how some of those cases are still active. We can sense positive changes and satisfaction among both those who both provide the service and those who use it. We are also always learning something new and developing and refining our work and methods, according to what is best for both service recipients and service providers.

    Adaptation and changes

    Examples of changes that have taken place are changes in application forms and work procedures, they have been updated as appropriate in each case.

    Changes have also been made in the contact persons, who were first department heads in preschools and elementary schools. In preschools the change was that the special education director of each preschool is now a contact person instead of department heads, which was a successful change in our opinion. In elementary schools the change was that an employee of the school service was defined as the project manager for the contact persons, that person is employed by the school service, but has a workplace within the schools themselves. The project manager therefore both serves as a contact person and manages the contact persons of the school. The manager is also responsible for introducing service integration to children and parents of the school, and since taking on the role has visited all the classrooms of the school, introducing the project and the manager's role. We also think this is a successful change for us. The project manager for contact persons works together with the implementation managers as well as the case managers of the second and third level of services.

    Some changes were made to who was defined as case managers, but first it was decided that all counselors for social and school services would become case managers. Shortly afterwards the implementing managers decided that a school psychologist would not be case manager but would be used as a resource in the support program. Children in integration could therefore receive three interviews with a psychologist in their program. The psychologist then assesses whether there is a need to continue. This was also a good change and we have added behavioral counselors as a resource in the support program.

    There have been a number of changes in how requests were distributed. First it went through the student services, where requests were distributed to department heads who were then contacts. That didn't last long, the student services were removed from the request process. Today no meetings are being held, and therefore there is no waiting for the case to be assigned to the right place. Children and parents have free access to contacts and work can therefore begin in an interview with a contact person, who fills out an evaluation sheet and request for service integration if the evaluation indicates that it would be in the interest of the child to integrate the case. Also, if parents send a request for service integration electronically through the portal, then it reaches the contacts or case manager, as appropriate, the same day.

    We have always kept track of all registrations but added our registration document following the registrations that were requested to come monthly from the National Agency for Children and Families.

    The future

    Even though we now have a stable work flow concerning the children's prosperity law, we are always learning and always looking at what we could do better and differently in our work, to make the service the best possible for those who request it and deliver it.

    Finally, I would like to add a text from a mother whose child is receiving services in stage 2 of integration:

    “I think there’s something so beautiful about my son having his own case manager, who both I and he can go to. I felt like I had been running uphill for 3 years, where I had to ask for a team meeting and fight for everything. I got warmth and joy in my heart when I was invited to a team meeting with my son by his case manager. I’m incredibly happy with this service and this new law”.

    Written: September 2024